Sunday, March 4, 2012

2011 Must have been a pretty weak year for movies

Because I just saw two of the Best Picture nominees last night, and gotta say, not impressed!

We rented Hugo and Midnight in Paris from Redbox last night.

http://www.100directions.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/HUGO-movie.png

Maybe Hugo loses something in the non-3D version, I don't know, but I thought it was just OK.

I definitely could have done without the Sasha Baron Cohen character.

http://images.christianpost.com/video/full/3123/sacha-baron-cohen-hugo-a-box-office-smash.jpg?w=640&h=416

 He felt really cartoony, and in a movie where all the plot points feel pretty contrived already, he was just not helping. I wouldn't say Hugo is a bad movie, I enjoyed it, but it definitely didn't feel like anything to write home about.



http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/midnight+in+paris_m.jpg 

Midnight in Paris, on the other hand was just awful. And I love Woody Allen. He's made some of my all-time favorites - Annie Hall, Hannah and Her Sisters, Manhattan, etc. And I looooove Paris. Seems like a sure bet, even with the potentially annoying presence of Owen Wilson. But I really hated this movie. It seems like we've already seen this a million times: Back to the Future, Peggy Sue Got Married, Groundhog Day, Hot Tub Time Machine. . .
Just the Rachel McAdams character alone is enough to make this movie painful. Nothing against McAdams, but the character is so ridiculously unpleasant, belittling and condescending to Owens at every turn that it's just not at all believable that anyone would want to marry her, much less a successful, reasonably handsome guy who must have other options.

http://www.thesnipenews.com/thegutter/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/owen-wilson-rachel-mcadams-midnight-in-paris-movie-image-600x399.jpg

Yes, I will wear this snotty expression throughout the whole movie!

 
 When Wilson confronts her, accusing her of having an affair with the equally ridiculously unpleasant "Paul" she says, and I'm paraphrasing here, something like "yes, I spent a few nights with Paul. . . Get over it!" which no actual human being would ever say.

And the whole point of the movie seems to be a combination of "hey, it's Hemingway! Hey, it's Dali'! Oh, look, Gertrude Stein!" and some moral about how people romanticize the past, which is a long way to go for that stunning insight.

 https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWQd0VZAGNz_VdCmnE-asS9MSp_nNsh3Ll7jFyyziOaOOwpEQHC_ul8cYa0fCDglox0Qoj-QW4X8kv5y1DgJWXaCt2U5HXNSisUjCqY8vXUNFjiDtPUT0ZwNJwbgD02BvD2A3J3C7XsCRJ/s400/dali_midnight-in-paris.jpg
 Look, we got Adrien Brody for two minutes!


 Oh, the 2012 guy romanticizes the 1920's, but the woman from the 20's romanticizes the Belle Epoque, and the people in the Belle Epoque romanticize the Rennaissance! You don't fucking say! People really feel an unrealistic nostalgia for what they think of as the "Good Old Days?" Holy shit! I never thought of that!

http://www.esquire.com/cm/esquire/images/2T/esq-midnight-in-paris-hemingway-photo-052011-xlg.jpg  
Also, who casts a skinny guy as Hemingway?

The only other Best Picture nominee I've seen this year is The Artist, which was really good, but I was surprised that it was Best Picture material. Now that I've seen some of the competition, it makes a lot more sense.
http://www.bestweekever.tv/bwe/images/2012/01/The-Artist-Dog-1326225404.jpg 
And the Oscar for Best Dog goes to. . .

2 comments:

  1. I haven't seen any of these movies, but they're all on my "to see" list some day. That could be tomorrow or 20 years from now. Hey, I'm busy!

    ReplyDelete
  2. 2010 amd 2011 both were pretty weak. Actually the period between 2005-2007 was pretty stellar and 2008-2011 was a definite come down. 2012-2013 have represented an improvement. Aside from Hugo I wasn't enthusiastic about any of the BP nominees in 2011. The only three movies from that year in general that I felt enthusiastic for were Drive, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo and Margin Call.

    ReplyDelete