I don't know why these fundamentalists are so obsessed with sex, but you'd think sex-obsessed people would be a lot less creepy talking about it.
Pastor Mark Driscoll Called Women “Penis Homes”
And that's not even the creepy part. That's just the horribly offensive part.
Here comes the creepy part:
The first thing to know about your penis is, that despite the way it may
see, it is not your penis. Ultimately, God created you and it is his
penis. You are simply borrowing it for a while.
Hmm, shouldn't it be a lot more impressive then?
While His penis is on loan you must admit that it is sort of just
hanging out there very lonely as if it needed a home, sort of like a man
wondering the streets looking for a house to live in.
Um, if it's just "hanging out there" you need to put on some goddamm pants, you pervert!
Knowing that His penis would need a home, God created a woman to be
your wife and when you marry her and look down you will notice that your
wife is shaped differently than you and makes a very nice home.
Because, prior to marriage, you would have no reason to suspect that women might be built differently "down there."
I wonder how long most fellas are married before they notice that "hey, my wife has a thingy down there and I'll just bet you that my peener might fit in there!"
Huh! Would ya look at that?
Therefore, if you are single you must remember that your penis is
homeless and needs a home. But, though you may believe your hand is
shaped like a home, it is not.
Um, you know hands are pretty flexible, right? You know that they can be configured into any number of shapes, right?
"Penis house" is actually one of the easier configurations.
So simple, even a dolt can do it!
And, though women other than your wife may look like a home, to rest there would be breaking into another man’s home.
Wait, what?
I thought you were going to say that cheating on your wife is a shitty thing to do, but WHAT? You shouldn't sleep with another woman because she is, what, the property of another man?
And, if you look at a man it is quite obvious that what a homeless man does not need is another man without a home.
No, they have homes. you just have to know where to look.
Paul tells us that your penis actually belongs to your wife, and once
you are married she will trade you it for her home (I Corinthians 7:4),
and every man knows this is a very good trade for him to make.
Her "home?" Can you just say the word "vagina" at least?
This might be slightly less creepy if you didn't sound like a 9-yeqr-old boy with a vague idea of how sex works.
Also, how does that trade work? If it already belongs to her, and also it already belongs to God, how can I trade it to her for anything? It doesn't add up. And it's creepy, creepy, creepy!
And last weekend, we finally attended one we've been wanting to see since we moved here, the Dragon*Con Parade.
For those of you not familiar, Dragon*Con is maybe the largest (I have no idea) gathering of sci-fi/fantasy/video game/ comic book aficionados.
I've never been a big sci-fi or fantasy fan, but I am a fan of creative people in elaborate costumes.
Anyway, I have no idea who a lot of the characters are, but I am really impressed with the talent of the costume people. (please don't make me say "cos-players")
This pretty much seems like Dragon*Con in a nutshell. A Star Wars jedi (I think) LARPing with a 300 Gladiator. (probably)
Jeezus Christ, Florida! Are you trying to win the "most horrible fucking state in the union" award?
Florida Senator Wants Bill Making Dinesh D'Souza's 'America' Movie Required Viewing for Teens in State
Republican Alan Hays said he’ll introduce in November
his one-page bill that simply states that students in the 1,700 Florida
public high schools and middle schools are to be shown the film unless
their parents object.
“I’ve looked at history books and talked to history teachers and the
message the students are getting is very different from what is in the
movie,” Hays said. “It’s dishonest and insulting. The students need to
see the truth without political favoritism.”
He said, without any sense of irony at all.
Because, I guess it's not political favoritism if the political point of view being favored is yours? Does that make sense? I don't think that makes sense, but I can't figure out any other way for that sentence to make sense either.
To that end, Hays said he wouldn’t object if teachers paired America with a liberal film to show the political differences. Indeed, many schools already show Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth
An Inconvenient Truth is a movie about SCIENCE!! It does not have a political point of view. Why would you think that a movie about climatology needs to be balanced out with a movie about goldangit, 'Murica is jes' plain awesome?
The only reason that it might seem like An Inconvenient Truth is a "liberal" film is because conservatives have made a conscious decision to oppose science. If I decide that I hate algebra, that doesn't make algebra anti-me. It just makes me a doofus.
“The most dreaded disease in America today is political correctness. We
need to inform our students of our whole history, and teach them how to
think, not what to think,”
And you're going to accomplish this by forcing them to sit throughTriumph of the Will America: Imagine the World Without Her? You are going to teach students how to think, not what to think by showing them right-wing propaganda?
I watched the trailer for this movie. It's pretty ridiculous.
Apparently, among the things that we as Americans are to be proud of, the things that could only happen in America are Martin Luther King Jr's "I have A Dream Speech" which could never have happened without several hundred years of slavery, Jim Crow and white supremacy, so ya know, great job, America!
We're supposed to be proud of the iPhones that are made by Chinese children in appalling inhuman conditions.
We're supposed to believe that only in America could a man be sent to walk on the moon, as if we are just going to forget that the reason we went to the moon is because we were afraid that the Russians would get there first, and had we not sent Neal Armstrong to the moon, there would be some Russian dude famous for being the first man on the moon.
We're supposed to be proud of Jackie Robinson, which makes sense, but I guess we're supposed to ignore the fact that it took how many decades before one major-league baseball team finally allowed one black player to join. And we're supposed to ignore the fact that Robinson's career involved putting up with a steady stream of insults, death threats, and various humiliations from fans and other players alike.
But we're supposed to imagine in horror the thought of a world in which America did not exist. Okay, I like a good thought experiment. Let's imagine. . .
Well, I imagine the people of Iran still having their democratically-elected government in place, meaning there would never have been an Islamic revolution and the Ayatollah would be just another obscure religious leader.
I imagine the people of Chile not having their duly-elected presidente' overthrown, so no one ever has to coin the phrase "death squad."
I can imagine many thousands of young African men and women not being kidnapped and forced into slavery.
Oh, and speaking of slavery, it's worth looking at what D'Souza has to say on the subject. It tells you a lot about how guys like him think:
“Did America owe something to the slaves
whose labor had been stolen?” D’Souza writes in the book … The answer is
yes, but “that debt … is best discharged through memory, because the
slaves are dead and their descendants are better off as a consequence of
their ancestors being hauled from Africa to America.”
Okay, that is a lot of horribleness for one paragraph, but look past the usual racist blather about how slavery happened a long time ago and there are no residual effects on the descendants of slaves, and gosh aren't they better off living in the greatest country in the world blah, blah, blah. . . We're used to hearing that crap from right-wing assholes. Just look at the first sentence.
“Did America owe something to the slaves
whose labor had been stolen?
So, that's it? Their labor had been stolen? When your boss shorts you on your paycheck, you've had your labor stolen. These people were enslaved. They were robbed of their freedom, their autonomy, their dignity and their humanity. They were treated as livestock. Often they were treated worse than livestock.
But to D'Souza, the problem with slavery is that they had their labor stolen. Because that's the only thing on which one could put a price tag. You can't put a price tag on human dignity, so that apparently is not a big issue for a right-wing nut like D'Souza. You can't put a price on horrific physical pain. You can't attach a monetary value to children being sold away from their parents, so apparently it's not important.
Ted Cruz’s Dad: “The Average Black Does Not” Understand The Minimum Wage Is Bad
The father of Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said black people “need to
be educated” about Democrats, so that they will vote Republican. Rafael
Cruz, who made the comments at the Western Williamson Republican Club’s
August meeting, added “the average black does not” understand that the
minimum wage is bad.
Um, yeah. . . the "average black" somehow just doesn't understand that thing that totally isn't true and is pretty much the opposite of true. Go figure!
During the speech, Cruz spoke at length about a recent conversation he
said he had with a black pastor in Bakersfield, California.
The black pastor that he totally made up? Probably.
“I said, as a matter of fact, ‘Did you know that Civil Rights
legislation was passed by Republicans? It was passed by a Republican
Senate under the threat of a filibuster by the Democrats,’” Cruz said.
“‘Oh, I didn’t know that.’ And then I said, ‘Did you know that every
member of the Ku Klux Klan were Democrats from the South?’ ‘Oh I didn’t
know that.’ You know, they need to be educated.”
Yes. The Democratic Party used to be the party of choice for white Southern racists. Excellent point.
And while we're on the subject, do you want to go ahead and tell the fictional black pastor who led this filibuster?
Because it was Strom Thurmond, the right-wing conservative. The right-wing conservative who led the Dixiecrat rebellion and then slid into the Republican Party and stayed there.
Telling people they should vote for Republicans because of the Civil Rights Act filibuster is like saying you should bet on the Dallas Cowboys to win the Super Bowl this year because Staubach is such a great quarterback. Because you know perfectly well which party is infected with the white southern racists these days.
“I am going to try to encourage everybody I can to buy a book written by
a black journalist. His name is Jason Riley. He wrote a book called Please Stop Helping Us,
talking about how all the handouts to blacks have kept blacks in the
poorhouse. And I’ll tell you what, I am going to make it my task to buy
15 to 20 copies of that book and hand it out to some black leaders to
read.”
Oh, good. That should earn you 15 to 20 punches in the nose! Black leaders probably love being told what they should think by some raving lunatic racist. I know I would!
“Jason Riley said in an interview, Did you know before we had minimum
wage laws black unemployment and white unemployment were the same? If we
increase the minimum wage, black unemployment will skyrocket. See, he
understands it, but the average black does not.”
Yeah, it's a real shame that the "average black" doesn't understand total bullshit that isn't true.
Wait, what?
