Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Random thoughts about Sarah Palin on the Today Show

1. Goddammit, I swore I would never write about Palin again. And yet, here I go.

2. Come on, NBC, have some fucking dignity. This horrible woman takes every opportunity to discredit the profession of journalism, constantly accusing you of bias, bad faith, and bearing false witness, not to mention just "makin' stuff up," and you reward her by feeding her insatiable lust for fame and attention? She's made no secret of her contempt for you, why lend her any of what remains of your credibility?

3. That stupid "Tweet." Going to go rogue and infiltrate some turf. You were invited on the show, you ridiculous imbecile! You're not infiltrating anything. You're selling out, and you're using the same weak rationale that every sellout has used, pretending that you're going to take them down from the inside, or whatever. Nobody's buying it.

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/01LR6Wu23AaKi/610x.jpg 
Except maybe these paint-huffers.

4. The whole "oh my God, newspapers!" and "hey, I'm writing on my hand" schtick? I don't know whether to pity you or congratulate you on being self-aware enough to realize that you are a walking punchline of a self-parody.

5. You seriously have the balls to say this about Katie Couric? "And, frankly, I'm ecstatic we beat the 'perky one,' 
The Perky One? Your whole shameful career is based on being the perky one. Your only political "skill" is your ability to say despicable, hateful things with a cutesy-poo smile and wink. You invented perky-as-substitute-for-anything-of-substance. The only reason Bill Kristol was smitten enough with you to twist McCain's arm to ad you to the ticket is your smarmy perkiness.

http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/39/2010/03/340x_custom_1268067003072_palin030810.jpg
Yes, yes, and those.


 

How is this indecent?

http://towleroad.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c730253ef0168e999a548970c-300wi


A student in Ohio has been told that he can not wear the above T-shirt because it is supposedly "indecent."

Sporting a T-shirt that could get him suspended from school, but one he considers a message of acceptance, teenager Maverick Couch has become a plaintiff in federal court.
Couch said he attempted to wear the shirt last spring for a student-led event called "Day of Silence," which is designed to take a stand against bullying.He said he complied with a request from the school principal to remove it, and subsequent requests for permission to wear the shirt were also denied. Couch said that he has been threatened with suspension if he violates the school stance.

So what could the school possibly be objecting to?
According to Lambda, when pressed for an explanation, the school wrote, "the message communicated by the student’s T-shirt is sexual in nature and therefore indecent and inappropriate in a school setting."

Oh. Well I guess the fact that the shirt  was illustrated with graphic photos of gay sex. . .oh, no, wait! It's a drawing of a colorful fish!

http://www.tomilyn.com/images/PinkRainbow.jpg 
Hey, whoah! This is a family blog!
 
So, would it be less offensive to accuse Jesus of homophobia? Yes.This is Cincinnati.

http://cmsimg.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=AB&Date=20120403&Category=NEWS&ArtNo=304030054&Ref=AR&MaxW=300&Border=0&Gay-student-sues-over-banned-T-shirt 
 
Seriously, how could anyone find this offensive?

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Fuck You, Vanity Fair

This is the photo they use to illustrate their story about women in television:







Although, to be fair, a lot of the blame has to go to the actresses willing to pose for this.

It seems especially awful in light of this:

(via Daily Mail online)

Lee Aronsohn, the co-creator of the CBS comedy Two and a Half Men is in hot water for saying female-oriented comedies have reached the point of saturation.
Speaking with the Hollywood Reporter at the Toronto Screenwriting Conference, he said: ‘Enough, ladies, I get it. You have periods.’
He complained of the latest batch of comedy shows targeted toward women, including 2 Broke Girls and Whitney.
He added: ‘But we’re approaching peak vagina on television, the point of labia saturation.’
But Aronsohn, 59, who is married and has three children, didn’t stop there.
He said that the show focuses on ‘damaged men. What makes men damaged? Sorry, it’s women. I never got my heart broken by a man.’

 Those remarks seem especially indefensible, so of course they were defended by giant sack of shit Rush Limbaugh, who had this nugget to add to the national discourse:

All he’s talking about here is the chickification of his business. He writes sitcoms – he’s a comedy writer. He says the women have taken over. It’s all vagina all the time. We get it! Ok women, let us alone.
 So, yeah, it seems like a perfect time to portray the women currently making strides in the television industry as pornified eye-candy. Way to go, Vanity Fair! Asses!

Nikki Haley speaks for Women

. http://images.politico.com/global/2012/04/120403_nikki_haley_605_ap.jpg

Gov. Nikki Haley On The View: ‘Women Don’t Care About Contraception’

Monday, April 2, 2012

One bad-ass soldier




Hell yeah!

And as a bonus, this bad-ass soldier has freaked out Tony Perkins.



 

Washington Update 

The Star-Strangled Banner

Ooh, good one! I see what you did there! Star Strangled? Zing! someone's wearing the clever-boy pants today! I mean, it doesn't make any sense, because who's the star, and what banner is he strangling? But still. . .

The Obama administration doesn't typically run its agenda up the flagpole, but at a military base in Afghanistan, the soldiers did it for them. There, in the dusty desert of war, an Army outpost saluted the colors of the homosexual lobby by flying a rainbow flag in place of Old Glory. Back home in America, a woman named Nicole Jodice posted the picture on Facebook, praising her husband for promoting, not the stars, but these stripes.

Okay, see, if anything, it seems like maybe you meant to say the stripes are maybe strangling the stars? Or something? Forget it. Anyway, it's not like the Obama administration has exactly been all that secretive about their agenda. You folks have spent the last 3+ years complaining about Obama "shoving" his agenda "down your throats."


http://obamaforwards.com/content/binary/possiblybestsignyet.jpg
Sound Familiar?

To some, like Mstr. Sgt. Corey Wade, these displays are an uncomfortable reminder of the open policy that few of the troops support.
Okay, now that's just a lie. In the run-up to the repeal of DADT, surveys consistently showed a majority of active-duty military personnel in favor of repeal. Most soldiers have served alongside gay brothers in arms and have found them to be every bit as brave and heroic as straight GI's. (and maybe even a bit more fierce!)

http://loop21.com/sites/loop21c.your-majesty.com/files/gay-marine-photo-homecoming.jpg

In response to the picture of a Marine with his legs wrapped around his boyfriend in Stars and Stripes magazine, Wade wrote a stinging letter to the editors, explaining that the military's rules on homosexuality may have changed, but the troops' reservations about it had not. 
And of course, Mstr. Sgt. Corey Wade is representative of all soldiers. That's what's called a scientific sample.

 And the troops aren't the only ones feeling the whiplash of the military's new policy. Just three weeks after President Obama publicly apologized for offending the Islamic community with the accidental Koran burning, this base is pledging its allegiance to an act that is nearly as incendiary. Where is the concern now for angering Afghan Muslims, who vehemently oppose homosexuality?

Seriously? You're suddenly worried about offending Muslims? Okay, let's pretend for a second that you actually give a shit about Afghan Muslims. Are you really equating the raising of a rainbow flag with the burning of their holy book?  Do you think that someone burning a Bible would be equivalent to someone saying "here's an area in which we believe differently"?

The decision to fly the flag is even more of a head-scratcher when you consider the Defense Department's obvious scorn for the Christian cross.

Um, only if you think that Gay is a religion or Christianity is a sexual orientation.


 http://dailycontributor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/gay-priests-273x300.jpg 
Or some combination thereof.

Last November, in Afghanistan's Camp Marmal, soldiers were ordered to tear down a cross that marked the chapel's entrance because it was, in Commander William Speaks's words, "a distinctly religious symbol." The camp's occupants were stunned. . . "I really don't understand why Christians are always attacked," said a service member. "It if was a crescent moon on top of a mosque, it would never be taken down."
Yeeeeeahhhh. . .  um. if it were a crescent moon on top of a mosque, it wouldn't have been on a US military base, genius.

Unfortunately, it appears this flag is just one way the President is taking his hostility toward religious freedom to new heights. 

Jeezus Christ, you people really don't understand the word "freedom" do you? I mean, you really seem to think that freedom means the exact opposite of what it means. Which wouldn't be so bad if you weren't constantly going on about it.

Oh, and also this:

http://silencedmajority.blogs.com/.a/6a00d834520b4b69e2015392437acc970b-500wi