Sunday, June 23, 2013

Rick Perry is Shockingly Stupid

  
 
 Gov Rick Perry, shown here giving the two-fingered ignorant douche salute, has issued a renewed declaration of a state of emergency for Texas.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry extends drought emergency in most of state


By CNN Staff
 
-- Texas Gov. Rick Perry has renewed a drought emergency in more than 200 counties throughout the state, authorizing "all necessary measures" be implemented to aid response efforts.
"Prolonged dry conditions continue to increase the threat of wildfire across many portions of the state," the governor's proclamation said this week.
 "These drought conditions have reached historic levels and continue to pose an imminent threat to public health, property and the economy."
 
 
 
Low rainfall and record high temperatures have reduced water supplies and aquifer levels, threatening many parts of the state, the proclamation said.
 
(emphases added)
 
 
So, one might be tempted to think that this constitutes an admission on the governor's part that yes, indeed, climate science is real, the global climate is indeed continuing to heat up. But no. No, Perry doesn't see the inherent contradiction between his proclamation that his state is experiencing "record high temperatures" and drought conditions of "historic levels" and his bedrock belief that climate science is “all one contrived phony mess that is falling apart under its own weight” and that "we have been experiencing a cooling trend, that the complexities of the global atmosphere have often eluded the most sophisticated scientists. . ." (source)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
He really doesn't see it.

The fact that Texas has been in a drought-and-heat-related state of emergency since July of 2011 has no bearing on his apparently faith-based belief that global warming can't be real because Al Gore believes it and fuck that guy! 
 
 
 
 
Oh, but don't worry, he's got a plan for dealing with the worst drought since the dust bowl:
 
 
 
Which, by the way, is his answer for pretty much every problem that elected officials ought to be dealing with:
 
 
Because when you really think about it, if everybody can just pray to the Almighty to fix everything, why do they even need Perry?
 
 
If I may paraphrase Louie DePalma, I wish Rick Perry was a little bit smarter just so that he could realize how stupid he is.
 



Friday, June 21, 2013

Welcome to the 15th Century!



(Trigger Warning: Domestic Abuse)









Just when you thought the religious right couldn't get any more retrograde, this shows up:

  

And yes, this is exactly what you're afraid it might be, a new movement in which "Christian" men are encouraged to physically "discipline" their wives. It's called "Christian Domestic Discipline" and it's basically a way for domestic abusers to convince themselves that they're doing God's work.

This is an excerpt from an article on some weirdo website called "Black Christian News Network One" :


'Christian Domestic Discipline' - Is This Really a 'Christian' Form of "Fifty Shades of Grey" or Domestic Abuse?


On a pain scale of one to 10, Chelsea ranks the epidural-free birth of her child as a six. Her husband's spankings? Those are an eight.

Now any normal person would move out, call the police, and/or shoot the bastard in the crotch herself, but not "Chelsea!"
 
But this isn't domestic abuse, Chelsea says. This is for Jesus.



Oh hell no! You're not pinning this on me!
 
 
Chelsea and her husband Clint, who asked that I use only their first names, belong to a small subculture of religious couples who practice "Christian Domestic Discipline," a lifestyle that calls for a wife to be completely submissive to her husband. Referred to as CDD by its followers, the practice often includes spanking and other types corporal punishments administered by husbands--and ostensibly ordained by God. While the private nature of the discipline makes it difficult to estimate the number of adherents, activity in several online forums suggests a figure in the low thousands.

Thousands?!?! There are THOUSANDS of these sick, dysfunctional relationships out there? This is un-god-damn-believable!

Clint was in the room while I talked to Chelsea. They do everything together, including running their blog, Learning DD, which chronicles their exploration of domestic discipline. When Chelsea gets flummoxed by a question, she asks Clint for guidance in a voice so high-pitched that it belies her 28 years: "Honey, how long does the spanking usually last?" (About 5 minutes, Clint says.)

Okay, I'm a little ashamed to admit that I learned this from Dr. Drew, but from what I understand, when a grown woman has a voice like a child, that indicates some childhood trauma. If she sounds like a 6-year-old, the trauma happened when she was around 6 years old. If she sounds 12, the trauma occurred around age 12, etc. Think of any woman you know with a little girl voice. I guarantee you there was some trauma in her childhood. It might be as seemingly minor as her parents divorcing or it might be as horrific as sexual abuse, but something went horribly wrong in this woman's childhood. Which would explain why she finds herself attracted to abusive men and probably even feels as if she deserves the abuse. And now some religious scumbags have found a way to exploit her self-loathing in the name of God. Wonderful!


When a wife breaks her husband's rules--rolling her eyes, maybe, or just feeling "meh," as one blogger put it--that can equal punishments which are often corporal but can also be "corner time"; writing lines (think "I will not disobey my master" 1,000 times); losing a privilege like internet access; or being "humbled" by some sort of nude humiliation

Nude humiliation. Shoulda seen that one coming. This has nothing to do with religious belief, this is just some sick pseudo-consensual S&M fetish being justified with some weird Biblical veneer. I understand that there are couples who are into S&M, and as long as both parties are into it and everyone involved is a consenting adult, then what the hell, have at it. But that doesn't seem like what's going on here. This seems like the type of situation where the husband is abusive and both he and the wife have found some way to rationalize the abuse so that he can feel like he's not an evil bag of scum and she can feel like she's not really a victim of abuse and that this is really just a type of love. The highest form of "godly" love.


 Some practice "maintenance spanking," wherein good girls are slapped on a schedule to remind them who's boss; some don't. Some couples keep the lifestyle from their children; others, like CDD blogger Stormy, don't. "Not only does he spank me with no questions asked for disrespect or attitude in front of them, but I am also required to make an apology to each of them," she writes.

I just. . . I don't even know what to say to something so horrific. Other than that someone needs to call CPS and have these children removed from this home. "Stormy" is an adult, if her particular pathology causes her to want to stay in this fucked-up situation, that's her choice, but how the fuck do allow your children to be involved in the ritual humiliation of their own mother?


And it does really seem like maybe at least some of these women are into it, maybe because they've been brainwashed, or maybe because they have terrible self-esteem issues, I don't know. But there are "DD" blogs (Domestic Discipline) with posts like this:


(Warning, decent human beings will probably find this disturbing)

January 25, 2008



Or this one, published in the "Doubts and Difficulties" section:

Spanks Too Hard?

Dear Group,
 
. . .I *think* he spanks very hard.  When it's punishment, it's always bare bottom with a wooden paddle. . .  But bare-bottom hurts so much more that I can't stand it.  I am always sobbing by the time it's over and feel very sick.  Yet compared to what some other ladies say they get I don't think it's too much.  I never have bruises, just a very sore red bottom for a few hours, which he says is not too much.  He says I'm a grown woman and my butt can take a lot and that if he just gave me a few "paddy cakes" I wouldn't learn anything.  In a way I think he's right, but I know I don't want it.

We have talked about and prayed about it, and he says it's because I haven't really submitted to his judgment.  That he would never really hurt me, but that we decided together before we were married that spanking would be something that was used, and now it's my duty to submit to it.  But all I know is that I have come to hate this, yet I want him to be happy and I really do feel that I did agree and promise before God to obey him.  He's agreed to consider using other discipline too, like writing lines, but when he assigned something like that to me lately, I felt so resentful, I just hated it.   He grounded me recently from the computer, and I couldn't wait to sneak on as soon as he went to work.  When he got home I lied about that too. 
I think really he's right.  I don't want to submit. I know that if we didn't have this relationship, I would NOT feel this resentful towards him.  If I could just say ( like some of my friends do) "Hey I got another speeding ticket.  Oh well."  and that's the end, it would be fine. 
I never should have agreed to any arrangement where I was expected to submit, but I do love him and don't want a divorce!  Help, what do I do?


Which "Emma" answered:



Might I suggest that you're narrowing your focus too much? You seem to be just focusing on the spanking, without looking at the big picture of what your husband is trying to do for you through loving discipline. As a godly man, he has seen you err and loves you enough to correct you for that error. It's not easy for a man to see his wife kicking and crying in distress, knowing he is the cause of her pain. And yet he is doing that because he loves you. Afterwards, you are unlikely to repeat the offense, and doesn't that reticence make you a better person? --Posted by: Emma

I can't read anymore of this. It's just too awful. If you want to read more about this sickening phenomenon, there's a good article on JEZEBEL.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Okay, I'm Back! What'd I Miss?

It's good to be back!
Oh, who am I kidding? I would've given my left arm to stay on that beach in Aruba. But return to the real world I must. And have. Oh, God, I hate it here! Someone come save me!


Anywayyyyyyyy. . .
 
So what did I miss whilst I was gone?
 
Oh, no. Wait. First let me tell you, dear readers, what I learned while on vacation.
 
1. The thong is back!



At least in Aruba it is. Good God a'mighty, I thought we'd seen the last of them back in the '90's, but apparently not! Dear readers, dear kind, gentle readers, I can not tell you the horrors I have seen lo these past several days. They were everywhere!!!!

  
 
 
Dear sweet lovely readers, I implore you. Spread the word. People must be made aware that whether you are young, pretty and fit or "normal," we don't need to see that much butt. It's too much! Whether your buttocks look like a statue of a Greek goddess's caboose or like a strip of cloth between two grocery bags full of golf balls, we don't want to see it. Especially if you have small children whose faces are at butt-height. No one wants to watch your children's future nightmares.
 
 
2. My fear and loathing of the Iguana may technically qualify
 as a full-blown phobia.
 
 
Look out! There's one now!
 
 
 
Not cool, internet. Not cool..
 
I know it's not rational. I'm pretty sure they're relatively harmless, and they certainly don't seem aggressive, but I will walk 20 feet out of my way to go around one. Because, come on. Look at them! they're obviously pure evil! I mean, Jeezus, their tales look like fucking king snakes! And what kind of non-evil creature has that sort of thing dangling from it's chin?
 
 
 Don't kid yourself, he'd peck your face off as soon as look at ya!
 
I think that in the hierarchy of evil animals, obviously the alligator is Satan. And that makes Iguanas his demon minions.
 
 
 
Canine Hitler? Probably.

 
And these vile, loathsome creatures are as ubiquitous as bare buttocks at the Holiday Inn Palms Beach. Some people even feed them.  Most small children aren't even afraid of them, which makes me feel a bit like a coward, but mostly like I'm just smarter than these small children who are about to have their souls taken from them.
 
 
 
How may I serve you, my dark Lord?
Kill my parents? Yes, master!
 
3. I'm really glad we don't pay for HBO
 
I'm not saying they don't have some good stuff. I hear Game of Thrones is supposed to be quite compelling.  But none of the good stuff is ever on when we are in a hotel with HBO. I didn't get to see "Girls," so I'm still not sure whether I'm supposed to love or despise Lena Dunham, which makes me feel like less of an engaged citizen somehow. (Tiny Furniture was pretty good) No, we get "True Blood." Good God, what a ridiculous show. And not because it's about vampires. I have no problem suspending disbelief for a good show. I'm a big fan of The Walking Dead and Orphan Black. And I loooooved Carnivale. But the episode of True Blood we tried to sit through, which, by the way was voted a fan favorite or viewer's choice or whatever, so it's not like we just caught them on a bad night or something, this was supposedly one of the best episodes, and I totally lost control of that sentence about 20 words ago.
Anyway, it's just a bad show.  Just bad writing. You can do a show about vampires. You just can't have a "vampire terrorist" fighting for "vampire rights" by killing a reporter on TV. And you can't have a character find out that she has faerie anscestry and that puts her in danger because faerie blood is the most delicious type of blood to a vampire. It's just too stupid!
 
 
And you don't deserve Christopher Meloni!
 
 


Also, HBO has Bill Maher who, as previously noted, is a prick. A smug, self-impressed little prick. I happened to see a minute of him doing a one-on-one interview with someone I didn't recognize when the subject of Jay-Z came up. Maher said he likes Jay-Z because "him and his girl" don't get into any trouble or something like that. Oh, I'm sorry, Bill Maher, when you say "his 'girl'" are you referring to worldwide superstar Beyonce'? Is that who you you're referring to, you misogynistic little asshole? Beyonce'?  The international super-platinum phenomenon? That's the "girl" whose name you can't bother to remember? God, I can't stand Bill Maher! (And a special welcome to those of you who found this page by using the search term "Bill Maher Is A Dick")
 
So what did I miss? I think I'm going to wait another day to find out. I'm pretty sure I'm going to be happier not knowing.



Sunday, June 9, 2013

Vacation!

We're going to be out of town for about a week. I can't imagine there will be any blog postings. Maybe Twitter if our hotel has wi-fi.

Se ya, suckas!

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Military Rapes are Everyone's Fault. (Except the Rapists')

You might think, when you hear about one person raping another person that the blame falls squarely on the shoulders of the first person, the one doing the raping. But that is only because you are a "normal person" who lives in the "real world." Let's take a visit to the right-wing parallel universe and see who is actually to blame in that dimension.

1. Khmer Rouge Feminists:
Michael Savage and Allen West


And here you thought that strong women were "feminazis!" No, that was yesterday. Now they're Femi-Khmer-Rouge-ists.
(via)
Savage, who hosts Cumulus Media Networks' Savage Nation, began the segment by playing audio of Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) talking about changing the military chain of command in sexual assault cases. After saying Gillibrand "sounds like a college chick at a dorm," Savage told guest West: "When I watch these Khmer Rouge feminists try to take over the military, this looked like an attempted coup to me, Colonel West."

West replied: "Nah, you're absolutely right and that's a big concern that I have because when you start to get -- you know, I understand civilian oversight of the military. We all understand that as all officers who served in uniform. But when you start to have this interjection of, you know, political, you know, will against, you know, the military, good order and discipline, where you start to try to usurp the commanders' authority and I guess replace it with some type of political, legal officers, and things of that nature. Then the next thing you know, it goes from just dealing with this, you know, sexual assault thing to, you know, making decisions on the battlefield."

Savage and West went on to discuss whether sexual assaults in the military are actually a problem. When West said that "there may be a problem, without a doubt, with sexual assault," Savage interrupted by claiming that sexual assault claims can include men asking women out for "a beer." He then asked West, "how many of them are fraudulent claims? We don't know, do we?"


See? Women are making up claims of sexual assault whenever they are asked out on dates so that civilian oversight of the military can . . . um, something. Something bad, I guess. But it involves 'chicks' taking over the military and putting it under civilian control which is totally not what the Constitution says!


2. Pornographers:
Senator Jeff Sessions



During the recent Washington DC hearings on sexual assaults in the military, Sessions had this salient point to bring up:

(Via)

SESSIONS: Mr. Chairman, I’d just add a letter, a document here that was given to me from Morality in the Media. Pat Truman used to be in the Department of Justice. I knew him when he was there. He points out that, a picture here of a newsstand and an Air Force base exchange with, you know, sexually explicit magazines being sold. So, we live in a culture that’s awash in sexual activity. If it’s not sold on base, it’s right off base. There are videos and so forth that can be obtained, and it creates some problems, I think.

And as we all know, pornography is totally not readily available to the civilian public which is why no one is ever raped outside of the military! And obviously the soldiers aren't to blame, because once a young man has been exposed to a copy of Hustler magazine, he can't possibly be expected to behave like a civilized human being. If any one of you out there ever accidentally saw a picture of a naked lady you'd turn into a rutting animal too. Which is why pornography is illegal in this country!

3. Hormones:
Senator Saxby Chambliss



(via)
The young folks that are coming into each of your services are anywhere from 17 to 22, or 23,” Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., said at a Senate Armed Services Committee meeting on military sexual assaults. “Gee whiz, the level -- the hormone level created by nature sets in place the possibility for these types of things to occur. So we've got to be very careful of how we address it on our side.”


Because anyone who has ever had contact with a 17-23-year-old male and says she wasn't raped is just a damn liar! Every 17-23-year-old male is so awash in hormones that he is physically unable to prevent himself from assaulting any woman within groping distance. Gee whiz! Everyone knows that!


 4. The Gays:
Mike Huckabee and Gen. Jerry Boykin (Ret)


 
 
Family Values!
And now here's a song about fucking underage groupies.

(Via)

Huckabee: General, there has been such a rash of sexual assault in the military and it’s become virtually epidemic. I wanted your assessment, do you think this has anything to do with the fact that we’ve so liberalized the policies of everything from women in combat, the whole conception of the separation of the gender, as well as saying we’re not going to have any restrictions on homosexuals in the military? Does that have anything at all to do with this?

Boykin: Well I think it has everything to do with it, Governor. We have seen, if I may use this term, a sexualization of our military with social engineering. One of the things that most of the people don’t realize is in a recent survey there are actually more men that have been sexually assaulted than women. We are trying to violate the laws of nature, failing to recognize that these young men and women are at the peak of their sex drive when we try to mix the genders for reasons that to me are illogical and in doing so what we are doing is we are inviting this kind of behavior,

Okay, to be fair, it's not just the fault of the gays. It's also because we've made this crazy decision to have men and women in the same place. Everyone knows that men and women must be kept separate at all times, lest the men be unable to resist the temptation of female flesh and act on their lust in the most violent inhuman way imaginable. That's why we should follow the example of Saudi Arabia where women are kept separate from men and no sexual assaults ever take place and everyone's happy!


5. The Gays AND The Womens:
Frank Gaffney

 


 We’re hearing a lot about sexual assaults in the military and the like, it’s not to defend that by any means but it is to say if anybody is surprised that by putting more women and for that matter homosexuals into the military you are not going to get as a result that kind of unacceptable behavior is fatuous, it’s irresponsible, it’s malfeasance, is what it’s amounts to.



I'm not sure what 'homosexuals" have to do with the rape problem, but generally it's a safe bet that they're to blame for pretty much everything in this parallel universe.