Monday, August 5, 2019

Not Helping







No, Atlanta Journal Constitution, "Tragedy" did not strike El Paso Walmart. Tragedy striking Walmart is Walmart being hit by a tornado. Or Walmart's roof caving in and crushing a bunch of people. Something for which no one is to blame. Tragedy did not strike the El Paso Walmart, a homicidal racist asshole struck the El Paso Walmart.

This kind of framing is not helpful. Treating gun massacres like natural disasters, as just one of the hazards of life like earthquakes in California or hurricanes in Florida is not helpful. It's whatever the opposite of helpful is.

This is what the NRA ghouls want. They want everyone to accept that mass slaughters are inescapable, that nothing can be done to prevent them, and that  your best bet is to arm yourself to the teeth so that you'll be ready to defend yourself when the unavoidable massacre inevitably comes to your mall or school or church.

So stop referring to these massacres as "tragedies." They are murders. Mass murders. And we absolutely CAN take steps to minimize them. If we have the collective will. And framing them as unfortunate catastrophes is not helping.



Wednesday, July 31, 2019

At least it's not just America.


I don't know if this is a new thing, but I only just heard of it a couple days ago on some podcast or other. There is a website called "Quillette." And holy shit, it is freakin nuts!
It seems to be based in Australia or maybe the UK,  but it does employ internet gadfly Andy Ngo as a "sub-editor." Anyway, this is the article that I heard about on the pod.



Cometh the Hour, Cometh the Man: A Profile of Boris Johnson

"Cometh the Hour, Cometh the Man" is an awfully dramatic way of referring to a clod like Boris Johnson.

Related image

Christ, just add an eyepatch and subtract 50 pounds and he's this guy:

Image result for steve martin dirty rotten scoundrels fork



You know, I thought it was only American conservatives who could look at a shambling, disheveled, bloated buffoon and see a superhero,

Image result for trump heroRelated image


but whatever it is, it seems to infect the British right as well.

I first set eyes on Boris Johnson in the autumn of 1983 when we went up to Oxford at the same time. . . With his huge mop of blond hair, his tie askew and his shirt escaping from his trousers, he looked like an overgrown schoolboy. 


Yeah. "looked like."

Yet with his imposing physical build, his thick neck and his broad, Germanic forehead, there was also something of Nietzsche’s Übermensch about him.

Image result for laughing donald duck gif 
Oh my God! "Übermensch!"

If by "imposing physical build" you mean "layered in middle-aged baby fat," and by "broad Germanic forehead," you mean "heavy cro-magnon brow," then sure. That's the ubermensch all over!


You could imagine him in lederhosen, wandering through the Black Forest

Image result for laughing donald duck gif


Okay, first of all, fuck you for making me picture Boris Johnson in lederhosen. 
Second, yeah - I could imagine him in lederhosen. Stuffing bratwurst into his buttery face in a biergarten somewhere, but wandering the Black Forest? 

Image result for laughing donald duck gif



Third, you're kinda tipping your hand with all the German stuff. Why not compare Johnson to some formidable British hero? I mean, you must have one, right? Some medieval king or something? When you start off by referring to Hitler's favorite philosopher, drop in the term for Hitler's super race of ideal pure Aryans and the only metaphors you have for power, strength, and toughness are all German, you're kinda giving the game away.


You could imagine him in lederhosen, wandering through the Black Forest with an axe over his shoulder, looking for ogres to kill.


Okay, yeah. I could imagine him wandering lost in a forest, looking for imaginary made-up creatures to battle. I could see him as a LARPer.

Image result for larper

Basically, this guy with worse hair.


 This same combination—a state of advanced dishevelment and a sense of coiled strength, of an almost tangible will to power—was even more pronounced in his way of speaking.



Okay, we get it. You reads the Cliff's notes of Also Sprach Zarathustra. Geez!

Also, where are you seeing "coiled strength?"

Related image



He began to advance an argument in what sounded like a parody of the high style in British politics—theatrical, dramatic, self-serious—when—a few seconds in—he appeared to completely forget what he was about to say. He looked up, startled—Where am I?—and asked the packed chamber which side he was supposed to be on. “What’s the motion, anyway?” Before anyone could answer, a light bulb appeared above his head and he was off, this time in an even more orotund, florid manner. Yet within a few seconds he’d wrong-footed himself again, this time because it had suddenly occurred to him that there was an equally compelling argument for the opposite point of view. This endless flipping and flopping, in which he seemed to constantly surprise himself, went on for the next 15 minutes. The impression he gave was of someone who’d been plucked from his bed in the middle of the night and then plonked down at the dispatch box of the Oxford Union without the faintest idea of what he was supposed to be talking about.


Yeah, now THAT sounds like Boris Johnson. And now, I assume you're going to explain how this buffoonery was actually evidence of his genetic superiority or some other such quasi-Nazi shit?

 The motion was deadly serious—“This House Would Reintroduce Capital Punishment”—yet almost everything that came out of his mouth provoked gales of laughter. This was no ordinary undergraduate proposing a motion, but a Music Hall veteran performing a well-rehearsed comic routine. His lack of preparedness seemed less like evidence of his own shortcomings as a debater and more a way of sending up all the other speakers, as well as the pomposity of the proceedings. You got the sense that he could easily have delivered a highly effective speech if he’d wanted to, but was too clever and sophisticated—and honest—to enter into such a silly charade. 


Image result for head slap 


Of course! He meant to do that! Jesus Christ!

He couldn't possibly have just been in over his head and getting rightly mocked and ridiculed by his fellow students. No, it must be that he was screwing up intentionally. To, um. . . make some kind of a statement. About Oxford. And how they take things too seriously. That is totally the sort of thing that a freshman could get away with doing at Oxford! If there's one institution in Britain than knows how to laugh at itself, it's Oxford!

In Boris, though, it was as if I’d finally encountered the ‘real’ Oxford, the Platonic ideal. 

Jeez, get a room!
Also, that rumbling you feel is Plato turning over and over in his grave.


 While the rest of us were works-in-progress, vainly trying on different personae, Boris was the finished article. He was an instantly recognizable character from the comic tradition in English letters: a pantomime toff. He was Sir Toby Belch in Twelfth Night demanding more cakes and ale, Bertie Wooster trying to pass himself off as Eustace H. Plimsoll when appearing in court after overdoing it on Boat Race night. Yet at the same time fizzing with vim and vinegar—“bursting with spunk,” as he once put it, explaining why he needs so many different female partners. 


Oh my God.
Oh my GOD!
So many female partners?

Image result for shudder gif

Image result for shudder gif

Related image

That's a long, convoluted way of making excuses for him being a pig.



He was a cross between Hugh Grant and a silverback gorilla.



Image result for boris johnson young

Well, you're half right!


My uncle had described him as a “genius” and as a boy he’d been regarded as something of a wunderkind.


And there you go with the German again. You just can't help yourself, can you?

There was the occasion when he was holidaying with his family in Greece, aged 10, and asked a group of Classics professors if he could join their game of Scrabble. They indulged the precocious, blond-haired moppet, only to be beaten by him. Thinking it was a one-off, they asked him to play another round and, again, he won. On and on it went, game after game. 

Oh, bullshit. That never happened. You expect us to believe that this guy

Image result for boris johnson confused

a ten-year-old version of this guy, had a stronger vocabulary than a group of classics professors? It doesn't pass the laugh test!


At the prep school he attended before going to Eton, Britain’s grandest private school, he was seen as a prodigy. A schoolmaster who taught him back then told his biographer, Andrew Gimson, that he was the quickest-learner he’d ever encountered. In the staff room, the teachers would compare notes about the “fantastically able boy.”

Image result for shudder gif

Oh God.
Oh, no. 
No no no no no no no..
What did those degenerates do to poor little Boris? 
There is no way that having English private school teachers comparing notes on you in the staff room can possibly lead to anything good.
That's something out of a Morrisey lyric.

Belligerent ghouls
Run Manchester schools

He grabs and devours
He kicks me in the showers
Kicks me in the showers
And he grabs and devours


Okay, this isn't funny anymore. I'm sorry. If Boris needs a sycophantic glowing hagiography to feel okay about himself after what he went through, then by all means, go right ahead. Just maybe lay off the German stuff, huh?



Friday, July 26, 2019

The stupidest six words of all time



So today I saw on my Twitter an article from Wonkette about Jordan Peterson

Image result for gag me gif


And it contained probably THE stupidest six words ever spoken, written, thought, or conceived of.

First, some context. Peterson, who for some inexplicable reason is someone that a ceertain segment of the population thinks is a serious public intellectual, was opining on why women should all be running around plopping out babies all the time.



There's a serious conversation to be had with young women. A woman asked me a question on my Q&A this month. She said that her friends are really down on her, because she claims to not be a feminist, but even more importantly, because she wants to have children. And they're telling her that only an evil and cruel person would bring a child into a world this terrible, and worse, to do the damage to the planet that that child will inevitably do. And people are very serious about this. And they are very hard on young women.


Okay, that never happened.
I'm guessing that this woman doesn't exist, that no such question was asked. Especially seeing as how what Peterson claims the woman "asked" was not a question, but a statement.
The only other possibility is that Peterson did actually get this "question" on his website or whatever and was too thick to realize that the person "asking" the "question" was bullshitting him. Because no one is responding to their friend's stated desire for a cute cuddly baby by telling her that she is "evil and cruel." This is an obvious lie,. But it's not even the stupid part yet. Well, it's A stupid part, but it's not THE stupid part.



Her is THE stupid part. The stupidest part. The sentence containing the stupidest six words ever assembled into a single phrase:



I always think of the Pieta because I kind of think of it as the Christian equivalent of the crucifix, 



Image result for the stupid


Yes, there it is. Did you catch that? "the Christian equivalent of the crucifix." The CHRISTIAN equivalent of the CRUCIFIX!

Peterson is saying that there is a thing that exists which is a version of a statue of Jesus Christ on the cross, but is a CHRISTIAN version of that.  How do you respond to that? I have no words.
A Christian equivalent of this:

Fontanini Crucifix - 0250


Like there's a non-Christian version of a crucifix.

I mean, you could certainly have a Buddhist equivalent of a crucifix. Or a Muslim equivalent. Or a Hindu equivalent. But a Christian version of the crucifix is like an athletic version of the Olympics. It boggles the mind that this is a person who is taken seriously by anyone.

Here's the whole quote:



I always think of the Pieta because I kind of think of it as the Christian equivalent of the crucifix, you know, you have Mary there with her broken son in her arms. And I think that the great adventure for women, at least in part, this is the maternal adventure, is to bring a child into the world, knowing full well the consequence is a crucifixion-like brokenness. And that it's still a mark of faith in the possibilities of being, to participate in that and not to hide from it and to say: 'Well, despite everything, I'm going to act out my faith in life and in the possibilities of being and I'm going to bring someone into the world who will be a net force for good rather than evil. And that's my moral obligation.'


Holy Saint Stupid on an idiot stick!

Where to begin?

Pewrhaps by boasting that I have seen the Pieta in person?

Related image

No, that would be rude. But true!

Anyway, this dolt thinks that even though a woman would know full well that the end result of bringing a child into the world is going to be " a crucifixion-like brokenness," She should somehow wish to do that anyway? Like if you told some woman that she has a rare genetic condition that will cause any sons or daughters she has to die a slow painful death while they are still young, you're supposed to find it admirable for her to say "well, that's okay. I really feel like I oughta have some kids anyway?"
Or the fact that he thinks that having babies is a "moral obligation," no matter how much pain and suffering and "crucifixion-like brokenness" those children would be fated to endure?
Or that he thinks that having a child whose fate it is to endure a "crucifixion-like brokenness" is not only a moral obligation, but also an "adventure?"
Maybe the worst part is that he thinks he has the right to tell women what they are "morally obligated" to do with their baby-making parts.
.
It's hard to fathom how much stupidity, arrogance, and just general shittiness Peterson can pack into one brief paragraph. I've read that bit over and over and each time I notice something new, some new nugget of idiocy or hubris or general dickishness to marvel over. A better writer than I could probably write a book about just that one paragraph.
You could probably get at least a magazine article out of the stupidest six words in the history of the English language.



Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Everything Wrong With America in One Headline




CEO tries to play hero, pay for students' late lunch bills: School board says no

MIKE SCOLFORO | ASSOCIATED PRESS | 





First of all, how eff'd up is it that there are families in the richest country in the world who can't afford food for their children? How eff'd up is it that there are children in this country whose only decent meal some days is their school lunch.

And how eff'd up is it that, instead of addressing the poverty problem in this country, instead of guaranteeing people who work for a living can actually earn a living, our society would rather wait around and hope that some wealthy person decides to swoop in and be a hero.

And how eff'd up and just plain EVIL is a school board that refuses to allow that rich guy to be the hero that saves the day?




Okay, to get the whole story, we have to go back a couple of days to this:

Kids could end up in foster care over unpaid school lunch bills, district says in letter
Associated PressPublished 7:59 p.m. ET July 19, 2019 | Updated 8:01 p.m. ET July 19, 2019


KINGSTON, Pa. — A Pennsylvania school district is warning children could end up in foster care if their parents do not pay overdue school lunch bills.
The letters sent recently to about 1,000 parents in Wyoming Valley West School District have led to complaints from parents and a stern rebuke from Luzerne County child welfare authorities.
The district says that it is trying to collect more than $20,000, and that other methods to get parents to pay have not been successful.

Who does this? Who threatens to take people's children away? Christ, these parent owe an avcerage of $20 each! Who could possibly think that they should have their children taken away?


Image result for scrooge are there no workhouses?

Wyoming Valley West's lawyer, Charles Coslett, said he did not consider the letters to be threatening.



Yeah, just like John Yoo did not consider torture to be torture. Of course they were threatening! What non-threatening interpretation is there of "You can be sent to dependency court for neglecting your child's right to food. The result may be your child being taken from your home and placed in foster care,?"


"Hopefully, that gets their attention and it certainly did, didn't it? I mean, if you think about it, you're here this morning because some parents cried foul because he or she doesn't want to pay a debt attributed to feeding their kids. How shameful," Coslett told WYOU-TV.


Why on Earth would you think that? Why would you possibly think that these parents are just choosing not to pay for their children's food? People are generally willing, if not eager, to pay their debts.

Image result for trump 
With a few notable exceptions.

I mean, I guess it's part and parcel with the general conservative mindset that people are poor because they choose to be. Or at least because they prefer sloth and  poverty to hard work and responsibility. But even if you believe that crap, my God - we're talking about feeding their children! No parent is going to choose not to shell out a few bucks to feed their kids!

Anyway, this story made the papers, and some kind CEO decided that he should pay off these people's debts so that they don't have to worry about having their children taken away, which is honestly what Jesus would do, and this school board asshole says no? I mean, this guy must realize that he is the villain in this parable, right? That this parable ends with the school board president being bound hand and foot and cast into the darkness where there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, right?




Todd Carmichael, chief executive and co-founder of Philadelphia-based La Colombe Coffee, said he offered to give Wyoming Valley West School District $22,000 to wipe out bills that generated the recent warning letter to parents.

Image result for coffee hero
Coffee Hero!
But school board President Joseph Mazur rejected the offer during a phone conversation Monday, Carmichael spokesman Aren Platt said Tuesday. Mazur argued that the money is owed by parents who can afford to pay, Platt said.


Oh my GOD!
Image result for oh my god gif




Who CARES?
Even if you're right, WHO CARES? You're getting your money either way!
If I go into your cafeteria and buy lunch and then say, hey, you know what, here's a hundred bucks, I'm buying lunch for the next few kids in line, are you going to say no? Are you going to be upset that they aren't having to pay for it themselves? It's a fucking gift! People are allowed to buy gifts for other people! Even people they don't know. Even people that you think don't "deserve" it. Even if every single one of these parents is secretly rich and just doesn't want to pay their bills for some stupid reason and they're just being irresponsible jerks, the coffee guy is still allowed to buy them gifts.

Related image




What if, instead of just cutting you a check for $22k, the coffee guy went to each individual parent and handed them the amount of money they owe so that they can, in turn, give the money to you to pay off their kid's lunch tab? Would that be okay? Or would you still have a problem because these parents aren't being punished for their poor life choices like not being born rich and not graduating from medical school?


“The position of Mr. Carmichael is, irrespective of affluence, irrespective of need, he just wants to wipe away this debt,” Platt said.

Image result for coffee hero

In a letter sent to papers in the Wilkes-Barre area on Monday, Carmichael said his offer was motivated in part because he received free meals as a child growing up near Spokane, Washington.
“I know what it means to be hungry,” Carmichael wrote. “I know what it means to feel shame for not being able to afford food.”
Carmichael said he was struggling to understand why district officials would not welcome his help.

Yeah, we all are, sir. We all are.



Monday, July 22, 2019

How many of these conferences are there?



I knew there was CPAC. And the Values Voters Summit. And the Stone Mountain Klanbakes. But this is one I'd never heard of until a couple days ago.





I will give them credit for this, though. At least they went ahead and held this in the ballroom of the Washington, DC Ritz Carlton. No feigning "common man" credentials. No pretending to be grassroots or representative of some anti-elite salt-of-the-earth plain folks. Nope, They went straight to the hotel chain most emblematic of decadent wealth, right in the heart of the nation's center of elite power. At least they're being honest.

But that is the ONLY credit they're going to get, because this conference presented a rogues gallery of some of the most despicable, depraved degenerates the right wing has to offer.

Confirmed Speakers:

















Okay, I don't know who Josh Hawley is, but the rest of these guys?

Image result for shudder gif

You've got John Bolton, the man who can only get erect watching videos of Iraqi bombing victims.
You've got Tucker Carlson, the pretty-much-official spokesman for white ethno-nationalism. And Peter Thiel, a man who made his fortune on the internet, which was created, developed, and paid for by the federal government, and now preaches libertarianism because he thinks that the government should just stay out of his business and not tax the money he made on a system FOR WHICH THE TAXPAYERS PAID!

There's a bunch of other speakers of whom I am glad not to have heard, but a few familiar names stand out. Like



      Daniel Pipes


A man who has made a career out of warning gullible bigots that Muslims will come to your country and totally do Sharia Law to you! Somehow!


and




Amity Shlaes

whom I really only know as the author of a ridiculous revisionist history of the Great Depression which posits that the Great Depression wouldn't have lasted so long had not FDR intervened. Which is kind of like saying that infection would have cleared up sooner if you hadn't used those damn antibiotics.


Oh, I found a quote from that book!


“The big question about the American depression is not whether war with Germany and Japan ended it. It is why the Depression lasted until that war. From 1929 to 1940, from Hoover to Roosevelt, government intervention helped to make the Depression Great.” ― Amity Shlaes, The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression


It's even stupider than I thought! Because, you know, if there's one thing that Herbert Hoover was known for, it was his policy of using the government to intervene in the economy!


There's the truly idiotic Salena Zito, whom we've discussed before: (here)



And someone of whom I had no knowledge until I saw her quote from the conference on Twitter the other day, Amy Wax.






that quote being:

“Let us be candid: Europe and the First World, to which the United States belongs, remains mostly white for now. And the Third World, although mixed, contains a lot of non-white people,” Wax said, according to a transcript posted by Vox’s Zack Beauchamp, who attended and reported on the conference. “Embracing cultural distance nationalism, means in effect taking the position that our country will be better off with more whites and fewer non-whites.”


Image result for holy shitsnacks gif




Changing the name from "white nationalism" to "cultural distance nationalism" doesn't make it any better. It's like when Philip Morris changed its name to Altria. That didn't make their product any less toxic.

So why another right wing conference? What is different about this one? What is this one going to cover that the CPACs of the world have left out?

Well. let's let them explain.

About

Politics in America, Britain, and other Western nations have taken a sharp turn toward nationalism—a commitment to a world of independent nations.


Yeah, that's not really what nationalism means. But I assume you know that.

This has been disorienting to many, not least the American conservative movement, which has, since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, grown increasingly attached to a vision of a global “rules-based liberal order” that would bring peace and prosperity to the entire world while attenuating the independence of nations.   



And by "peace and prosperity," we of course mean invading, nombing and overthrowing the governments of any country to whom we take a dislike.

The return of nationalism has created a much-discussed “crisis of conservatism” that may be unprecedented since modern Anglo-American conservatism was formulated by Russell Kirk, William Buckley, and their colleagues in the 1950s.


Yes, then as now, the crisis is over how much of the racist part to say out loud.


The conference on “National Conservatism” will bring together public figures, journalists, scholars, and students who understand that the past and future of conservatism are inextricably tied to the idea of the nation, to the principle of national independence, and to the revival of the unique national traditions that alone have the power to bind a people together and bring about their flourishing.

Or, to put it a bit more succinctly, Ein Volk, Ein Rich, Ein Fuhrer.



We see this public conference as the kick off for a protracted effort to recover and reconsolidate the rich tradition of national conservative thought as an intellectually serious alternative to the excesses of purist libertarianism, and in stark opposition to political theories grounded in race.


Image result for laughing gif

Okay. sure! American conservatism in opposition to theories grounded in race!
You betcha!

Related image

Oh, man! Good luck with that!