And let's say you read something that was posted on a humor/satire website.
And let's just say that you were dumb enough to believe it and too lazy and perfidious to do any basic fact-checking.
Then let's say that after you reported the joke as fact, you were informed that the joke was, in fact, a joke.
There are a couple of legitimate responses from which you could choose.
You might say something like: "Sorry, folks, it looks like I've been had. That story was made up as a joke. I'll try to be more careful in the future."
Or you could get angry at the person who posted the joke and try to blame him for your mistake.
But what if you were Rush Limbaugh? (uggggh, shudder!)
If you're Rush Limbaugh, you go with the "it's false, but I stand by it" defense.
"So, I can say, "I don't care if these quotes are made up," he said. "I know Obama thinks it.
"You know why I know Obama thinks it? Because I've heard him say it."
Oh, Rush! You're irrepressible!
Hey, remember when Dan Rather quoted a document which may have been fake (still hasn't been proven) in support of a story whose basic facts were 100% true?
And remember how the right howled for his head? And they got it?!!
Shouldn't they be holding Rush to a similar standard?
Isn't reporting on an obvious fake as if it were fact in service of a story which is total bullshit (and really, the fake article IS the story) like 10 times worse than Rather's mistake? What are the odds that the righties will be calling for Limbaugh to be fired now?
And, yes I know, they'll say that Limbaugh isn't a journalist, he's an entertainer or an editorialist, or whatever, but when he reported this phony story on the air, he was absolutely acting as a reporter. Shouldn't he have to have some standard of integrity?
It's beyond me how anyone thinks this assclown has any credibility.
Hey, remember when Dan Rather quoted a document which may have been fake (still hasn't been proven) in support of a story whose basic facts were 100% true?
And remember how the right howled for his head? And they got it?!!
Shouldn't they be holding Rush to a similar standard?
Isn't reporting on an obvious fake as if it were fact in service of a story which is total bullshit (and really, the fake article IS the story) like 10 times worse than Rather's mistake? What are the odds that the righties will be calling for Limbaugh to be fired now?
And, yes I know, they'll say that Limbaugh isn't a journalist, he's an entertainer or an editorialist, or whatever, but when he reported this phony story on the air, he was absolutely acting as a reporter. Shouldn't he have to have some standard of integrity?
It's beyond me how anyone thinks this assclown has any credibility.
1 comment:
So Rusky gets punked because he does not fact check? Wow, what a surprised.
Oh, and when contronted that he was punked, he defended himself by saying "we stand by the fabricated quote because we know Obama thinks it anyway"
After so many years of mis-labeling and mis-characterizing others he gets smacked down by the NFL "Not For Limbaugh". Way to go NFL, Great job!
Post a Comment