Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Interesting Legal Approach

So two of the families of the people murdered in Benghazi are suing Hillary Clinton. I can't hold that against them. They're grieving, and they feel like they need someone to blame, I get that. But, considering that Secretary Clinton has been exonerated by about two thousand Republican investigations that were designed specifically to find a way to blame her, I don't see how they're going to find a lawyer willing to take this loser of a case.

Enter Larry Klayman.

Wait, Larry Klayman hasn't been disbarred yet?

Not even after this?

Right-wing lawyer Larry Klayman announced in WorldNetDaily over the weekend that he was filing a lawsuit against President Obama, Black Lives Matter, Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton "for endangering not just my life, as a white law enforcement person of Jewish origin, but also for all Americans, white, black, yellow or brown, no matter what their race or religion.

 Shhh. . . no one tell him! He thinks he's a "law enforcement person!"

Or this?

Klayman Discusses Citizens Grand Jury to Seek Indictment of Justices Roberts and Kagan

Anyway, what novel legal approach is America's worst lawyer going to take, seeing as how even her greatest enemies have not been able to find a way to blame her for the tragic deaths?

Having used a secret private email server that we now know was used to communicate with Ambassador Christopher Stevens with confidential and classified government information, and which we now know was likely hacked by hostile adversaries such as Iran, Russia, China and North Korea aligning with terrorist groups, it is clear that Hillary Clinton allegedly negligently and recklessly gave up the classified location of the plaintiffs’ sons, resulting in a deadly terrorist attack that took their lives.

Who else could have come up with such an innovative legal approach?

If Hillary Clinton hadn't used a private e-mail server, which we can just assume was hacked by everyone from Kim Jong Un to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the terrorists would never have known that there were US State Department employees in the, um, US Embassy. . . wait. I think I see a flaw in your case, Larry.

"Gosh," the terrorists would have said, "I'd sure like to kill some American infidels, but where could we find any?"
"How about that building with the American flag out front? The one with US Marines guarding it?"
"No, I'm pretty sure that's a Chinese restaurant. I got no beef with the Chinese."