Flashback Friday -- The Knitters

Fuck You, NPR

NPR host’s involvement in Occupy D.C. leads to her firing

A public radio host was fired on Thursday after the conservative political site The Daily Caller exposed her role as a spokeswoman for Occupy 2011, the faction of Occupy Wall Street movement occupying Washington's Freedom Plaza.

Lisa Simeone, NPR


You know, NPR, you can throw as many sacrificial lambs onto their altar as you want, they are never going to like you. They are never going to stop attacking you or trying to de-fund you. Do you think that CNN getting in bed with the Tea Party has stopped the wingnuts from referring to them as the "Communist News Network?" (it hasn't)
You could remake yourself as FOX Jr. and it wouldn't matter, because their problem with you has nothing to do with what you actually are or what you actually say. As long as you exist, they can keep telling their brain-dead mob that their tax dollars are being used to promote left-wing propaganda or whatever, and their idiot followers will stay angry and frightened enough to keep buying their books or listening to their radio show or watch their bullshit network, because none of them will ever actually tune in to NPR to see for themselves whether this alleged bias actually exists.

Is this firing an attempt to make up for the Juan Williams firing? Because a) it won't, and b) this is not a similar situation. Juan Williams was allowed to work for the FOX propaganda mill  for years without being fired. It wasn't until he said something offensive about Muslims that he was let go. Lisa Simeone has not been accused of saying anything offensive about anyone. She has merely been accused of participating in the Occupy movement. Look at your own press release:

"We recently learned of World of Opera host Lisa Simeone's participation in an Occupy D.C. group," NPR communications SVP Dana Davis Rehm wrote in a memo to affiliates. "We're in conversations with WDAV about how they intend to handle this. We of course take this issue very seriously."

What the hell is that? You're taking what issue seriously? If someone was to read this paragraph who had never heard of "Occupy D.C." they would think that it must be an organized crime family or some group of skinheads or something. Why would her participation in a peaceful demonstration be something needs to be "handled?" Why is that something that you "take very seriously?" It only makes sense if you begin with the assumption that everyone knows that the Occupy movement is engaged in illegal or immoral activities, and that any association with them would be cause for concern.
Your press release would make sense if Simeone had participated in, say a NAMBLA parade, or had been a spokesperson for the Army of God or something. Then it would make sense to call up WDAV and say "how do you want to handle this?"
Also, Lisa Simeone is not a journalist. She hosts the freaking World of Opera, for fuck's sake. So it's not like you can claim that her participation had compromised her objectivity.

 

I don't know what's worse about this story, the actual firing or the way Yahoo! News chose to cover it.
 Because they chose to say shit like this:

The concern is not entirely sudden. Last year, the radio network former political correspondent Juan Williams [sic] for confessing on Fox News's "O'Reilly Factor" that he felt apprehensive when he would see Islamic passengers in airports. Williams' ouster eventually led to the resignation of NPR chief Vivian Schiller's, and a black eye for its image.

Oh, here comes the false equivalency express, right on time!

And earlier this year, conservative media prankster James O'Keefe captured an NPR fundraising executive on video making disparaging remarks about Republicans and the tea party movement to two conservative activists posing as Islamic donors. 

Okay, that's just a lie. O'Keefe edited the video to make it seem as if they were making disparaging remarks about Republicans and the Tea Party.  And James O'Keefe is not a "prankster." He is a deceptive, dishonest libelous smear merchant.

It's also true that Simeone's role at the network isn't simply limited to opera coverage. According to her bio on NPR.org, Simeone has "developed a loyal following for her unusual mix of programming--classical, folk and jazz, along with provocative reports, interviews and call-in shows on everything from anthropology and neuroscience to philosophy to media criticism."

Oh, not just opera, also jazz and folk music? Oh, yeah she's got to go!

And, as Poynter's Julie Moos noted, this is not Simeone's first stint as an activist. In 1994, Simeone helped organize demonstrations outside a Baltimore courthouse to protest violence against women.

Oh my God! She came out against violence against women? What a controversial stand! Well, I can see why NPR would not want to be associated with such a radical firebrand! It is absolutely essential to maintain an air of impartiality when dealing with a contentious issue like "is violence against women bad?"

 

Well, that's one opinion. Now with an opposing view. . .

Lisa Simeone has addressed her firing in an e-mail to the Baltimore Sun. You can read the whole thing here.

 

But here are a couple of excerpts:

This sudden concern with my political activities is also surprising in light of the fact that Mara Liaason reports on politics for NPR yet appears as a commentator on Fox TV, Scott Simon hosts an NPR news show yet writes political op-eds for national newspapers, Cokie Roberts reports on politics for NPR yet accepts large speaking fees from businesses.  Does NPR also send out "Communications Alerts" about their activities?

And:
What is NPR afraid I'll do -- insert a seditious comment into a synopsis of Madame Butterfly?

Oh, SNAP!
 
So, in summary, fuck you, NPR. I'm glad that I have never donated to you. I'll save my donation dollars for Pacifica Radio, who manage to get by without sucking up for corporate money.

A disturbing trend in advertising.

The pseudo-smooth 70's dirtball spokesman







Why would anyone take advice from someone like that? Who thinks that this would be an effective marketing tool? Hey, if we get a spokesman who looks like he hangs out in front of the 7-11 all day making rude comments to underage girls, and have him promote our fine product, wait, what were we going for here?

 

Hey, ladies, buy some insurance, all right all right!

Baseless Charges of Anti-Semitism

So now I'm seeing all over the net that the Occupy Wall Street crowd is anti-Semitic?
Seriously, this ridiculous claim is popping up all over the place.

Occupy Wall Street's Anti-Semitism Condemned

Tuesday, 18 Oct 2011 08:13 AM

Share:

• 2
  inShare

The Emergency Committee for Israel has launched a highly critical video condemning anti-Semitic sentiment during the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) protests and calling for Democratic leaders to stop supporting the movement.

Occupy Wall Street Has an Anti-Semitism Problem

Abe Greenwald | @abegreenwald 10.11.2011 - 2:29 PM 

The Jew-hatred among protesters and sympathizers is diverse and unapologetic. It is, in fact, atmospheric. Tune in randomly to live television coverage of the spectacle and you’ll see—as I did—placards scapegoating Israel, Zionism, or “Hitler’s bankers.”  

Okay, so if you click on the link this twit provides, you see this image:

 

Yes, this fellow is accusing Wall Street of having done business with Hitler. Somehow, this is read as anti-Semitism. 

Calling this sign "anti-Semitic" would be like. . .  well, it's really not like anything. It's really singularly stupid. 

He continues. . .

Does anyone recall how hard the media worked to portray the Tea Party as bigoted? The false accusations of racial slurs, the cropped photograph of the gun-wielding Tea Partier—who turned out to be black, the tortured racial interpretation of the Tea Party’s desire to “take the country back”?

 Mainly I recall how hard the media worked to portray the Tea Party as some sort of legitimate grass-roots movement. I must have missed the other part.

Where the Tea Party couldn’t be tagged as racist no matter how hard liberals tried, Occupy Wall Street protesters are literally boasting of their Nazi credentials.

Apparently there was ONE guy who called himself a Nazi.
(http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/eyewitness-history_595200.html?nopager=1) 
And obviously one Nazi is one too many, but the Occupiers don't really have any way of keeping the nutsos out.

 Of course, the RNC has gotten in on the act:

RNC: Why don't Dems decry 'Occupy' anti-Semitism?

The Republican National Committee attacked Democrats on Wednesday for staying silent about “extreme anti-Semitic, anti-Israel comments” reported at the Occupy Wall Street protests.

Conveniently lumping opposition to the policies of the Israeli government in with anti-Semitism, eh? So predictable. Just like how when the teabaggers protested the imaginary policies of the Obama administration, the Republicans condemned their "anti-American" comments, because if you dislike a government's policies, you obviously hate everyone who lives in the country governed by that government.

Spicer said Democratic leaders supporting the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations is hypocritical in light of how they’ve previously spoken about the tea party movement.

“Democrats were quick to single out any instances of perceived extremism among Tea Party supporters, but with Occupy Wall Street, they turn a blind eye,” he wrote.

Yes, if by "turn a blind eye," you mean "completely ignore." Really, I think they are turning two blind eyes to the OWS movement.

The purpose of the Tea Party was to get government out of all Americans’ lives. The point of Occupy Wall Street is to scapegoat fellow Americans. And wherever political scapegoating takes place, anti-Semitism is sure to follow.

So, sure let's just go ahead and assume that these folks are going to turn all anti-Semitic, it's bound to happen eventually, so let's pencil it in for, let's say next Thursday?  Damn, that is about the dumbfuckingest argument I have ever heard.

But this one is my favorite. You have to see this to believe it. It's from some painfully stupid website called the PJ Tattler, which I assume has something to do with the asinine Pajamas Media:

Bizarre neo-swastika reminiscent of “The Great Dictator” used as power symbol by OWS leaders

Hmm, I don't recall seeing any sort of swastika-looking symbol on any of the leaders of this leaderless movement.

El Marco, one of the best citizen photojournalists in the country, this morning published an outstanding photo-essay about the Occupy Denver protests over the weekend, and in it he makes this highly disturbing observation: “An Occupy Denver community organizer leads the bizarre chanting ritual. Never have I seen anything that comes as close to a mind-control exercise in a free society. The orange tape insignia on this woman’s arm indicates that she is a leader. I was told that any questions I had could be addressed to someone with this type of insignia. When I first saw this militant-looking marking, it reminded me of the Order of the Double-Cross, made famous in the Charlie Chaplin movie, The Great Dictator.”

Um, you do realize that The great Dictator was, oh never mind. Let's see this swastika-esque insignia

Various people throughout the crowd were wearing the symbol:

Note also how when the “leaders” put the symbol on their sleeves (as in the first and third photos), it is rotated 45 degrees just like the Nazi swastika was.

Oh My God. It's a fucking POUND SIGN!
aka "Number sign," aka "hashtag."

 

The New Nazi Salute

This could not be more desperate.

Cain's Campaign Just a Giant Grift?

TPM2012

Herman Cain Spends $100K In Campaign Cash On Herman Cain Inc.

A review of Cain’s last two FEC reports shows the campaign transferring just over $100,000 in cash to Herman Cain T.H.E. New Voice, a company that promotes Cain’s books and political philosophy.

So, is Herman Cain's presidential run just a Palin-style long con? Probably. But somehow he has accidentally found himself in first place. It's basically The Producers but with pizza.