Friday, July 23, 2010

The Stupidest Question I've Heard in a While

From some stupid website called "Big Journalism"

does anyone really believe that Andrew Breitbart would intentionally distort a video clip to make a one-day splash?


Aha. Ahahaha. BaHaHaHa!!!!!!
http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-0702-2316-5904_Brown_Bear_Laughing_Hysterically_clipart_image.jpg

Risk his growing reputation with a deliberate, easily refutable distortion?


Growing Repu. . . BAHAHAHAAAA!!!!
http://dclips.fundraw.com/zobo500dir/excl_ed_comoglio_marbatch_Image-13-BW.jpg
Oh, God! Stop, you're killing me!

Risk his growing reputation! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

Okay, no, I'm sorry! Would Breitbart intentionally distort a video? Just to make a one-day splash? Seriously? That's like asking if John Dillinger would intentionally rob a bank just to get money! Oh, the very idea! As if Dillinger would risk his sterling reputation just for the financial gain he might expect from bank robbery! For shame! Why, robbery was the furthest thing from Dillinger's mind! He only asked the teller to put the relevant currency in his bag, if she misunderstood and accidentally gave him all the money in the bank, well how was he to know?

Would Andrew Breitbart intentionally distort? How is that even a question? The only way I could see anyone even half-seriously posing that question is if. . . hang on a second, let me check something. . .

http://bigjournalism.com/wp-content/themes/big-journalism/images/header.jpg


Oh, okay. Now it makes sense.

http://www.rowan.edu/clubs/psych/SI-Smithers.gif

Oh, how could anyone think that Mr. Burns would do something dishonest?!?!
Who could suggest such a thing?

So good going Breitbart, you got someone who works for you to defend you. Great job. Maybe you can call him as a witness when Shirley Sherrod sues you for defamation of character. Hopefully after ACORN finishes suing you for libel, and every ACORN employee who was made to look like a criminal in your fraudulent bullshit pimp 'n' ho video sues you for defamation.

No comments: