Monday, February 22, 2010

New Rules for Olympics



After seeing the Russian ice dancers' take on Aboriginal folk dancing, it's clear something has to be done.




"At times, Shabalin led Domnina around by her ponytail. They mugged, stuck out their tongues and mimicked the hand over mouth gesture that was once associated with American Indians."
(Yahoo News)


And it's not like they were just somehow unaware that this was going to be offensive:

When the Russian pair did the Aboriginal dance at the European Championships in January, they drew criticism from Aboriginal leaders who found the dance and costumes offensive. Domnina and Shabalin toned down their costumes and removed their face paint, but made no changes to their Aboriginal dance.


And why do this at all? Because the ice dancing officials decided that this year's theme for the original dance was to be "folk dancing." Now one might think that the Russian pair might choose a Russian folk dance, but no. So apparently it falls to me to make new rules for future Olympians.

Rule #1: No ice dancer may ape any culture other than their own. That should have gone without saying, but apparently not, because the American pair saw "Slumdog Millionaire" and figure they knew a little something about the culture and traditions of India.



Rule #2: If you have a son and a daughter who are both into ice dancing or figure skating, you are required to make them choose other partners, because this:

IMG_4820 by Shine Like Stars.

Wacky figure skating photos

is just un-fucking-acceptable.

It is not possible for John Kerr to be gay enough to make titty-humping his sister acceptable.
I won't have it.

Rule #3: Biatholon will no longer be ski, stop, shoot, ski, stop, shoot. Participants will now be required to shoot while skiing. Preferably with a gun in each hand like a John Woo Movie.

http://www.daviddylanthomas.com/wp-content/uploads/blog/atop50action/hardboiled.jpg

Rule #4: Ski jumpers need to do something while they are in the air. Ski jumping is insanely dangerous, but the ski jumpers make it look so easy it seems kinda boring. You're up in the air for like five fucking minutes, do a trick. Or shoot something. I don't know, do something to make us appreciate your skill.

http://www.epochtimes.de/pics/2009/03/04/xxl/2009-03-04-xxl--20090304070547_Japan_Freestyle_Skiing_World_Championships_LJM120.jpg



Rule #5: During individual figure skating, all skaters are on the ice at the same time. They should be knocking each other over like Battling Tops.

http://www.samstoybox.com/toypics/BattlingTopsBox.jpg

If it's good enough for short track, it's good enough for figure skating.

Least Surprising Headline of the Day

From the Washington Post:

Obama offers new health-care plan; GOP slams it as 'government takeover'


Because they will slam you no matter what you do, Mr. President.

If you killed a bunch of terrorists, these nutbags would find a way to slam you for that.

Really?

Shit, I was just kidding.

Bush Official Criticizes Obama For Killing Too Many Terrorists

(from the Huffington Post)

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Lindsey Vonn uses UVEX ski goggles.

For the back story, see: http://monkeymucker.blogspot.com/2010/02/ioc-can-suck-it.html

Olympic gold medalist Lindsey Vonn uses Uvex ski goggles. She used them when she won both gold and bronze at the 21st winter Olympic games in Vancouver.

Pass on this information to everyone you know. Put it on the Facebook or the tweeter or the MySpace. Let's make sure everyone knows that Lindsey Vonn

http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/02/21/alg_olympics_lindsey_vonn.jpg

Used Uvex ski goggles

http://www.uvex-sports.de/uploads/pics/Vonn_480_01.jpg

when she won Olympic Medals

http://media.nj.com/olympics_main/photo/lindsey-vonn-gold-medal-220jpg-061ab14f5566ace3_large.jpg

in the Vancouver Olyimpics.

http://netdna.webdesignerdepot.com/uploads/2009/03/2010_winter_olympics_logosvgpn.png

The IOC may be able to stop UVEX from mentioning this totally true fact in their ads, but what are they going to do, sue me?

Really? They would?

Oh, shit!

I mean, bring it on!



The WSJ Editorial Page Continues to be a Joke.


Consensus or Con?

The global warmists are the real deniers.


This column was scoffing at global warming back when global warming was still cool.


Okay, that's the first sentence of paragraph One.

Here's the first sentence of paragraph Two:

As we've written on various occasions, we didn't know enough about the substance of the underlying science to make a judgment about it.


So, I don't know anything about the science, but that doesn't stop me from scoffing at it?

And this is a person we're supposed to take seriously? This is someone given a forum in one of the biggest newspapers in the world?

Of course, this is the same paper that gives us this:

  • [1opr]

    Vindicating John Yoo

    Bush lawyers are found to have acted ethically, unlike their accusers.

The Wall Street Journal, what a freakin joke.

Hey, Look!

http://img.alibaba.com/photo/206973853_2/women_s_bathrobe.jpg

It's a reverse Snuggie!

What won't they think of next?